Cladding Testing

Glossary · Two-word term

Insurance Premiums

In short

the amount paid for an insurance policy covering property or liabilities

Insurance premiums are the recurring costs paid to insurers for property coverage, significantly influenced by the fire performance of a building's external wall system and the quality of technical documentation provided by building owners.

Last updated

Appears 82 times across this site

Insurance Premiums

Definition and Financial Context

In the context of the UK built environment, insurance premiums represent the recurring financial consideration paid by a policyholder—typically a freeholder, Resident Management Company (RMC), or Right to Manage (RTM) company—to an insurer in exchange for coverage against specified risks. These risks primarily encompass property damage (Buildings Insurance) and third-party liabilities (Property Owners' Liability).

The calculation of these premiums is a function of actuarial risk assessment. Insurers evaluate the likelihood and potential severity of a claim, applying a rate to the declared value of the building. Within the cladding sector, the premium is not merely a fixed administrative cost but a dynamic variable influenced by the perceived vulnerability of the external wall system (EWS) to fire spread and the subsequent potential for total loss or significant structural damage.

Role in Cladding Remediation Projects

Insurance premiums are a central consideration throughout the lifecycle of cladding testing, repair, and replacement. During the initial investigative phase, the presence of certain materials may lead to a reassessment of the building’s risk profile, often resulting in adjusted premiums or the imposition of specific policy conditions.

When a building undergoes remediation, the insurance premium often reflects the transitional state of the asset. For instance, the presence of scaffolding, the temporary removal of fire breaks, and the performance of 'hot works' are factors that insurers monitor closely. Once replacement works are completed and verified by a competent professional—often documented through a revised EWS1 form or a completion certificate from Building Control—the premium may be subject to further review based on the reduced risk profile of the new, non-combustible materials.

Building Fabric and External Wall Systems

The technical composition of the building fabric is a primary driver of premium volatility. Underwriters scrutinise the individual components of the external wall, including the outer rainscreen panels, the insulation layer, the presence of cavity barriers, and the methods of attachment.

Component CategoryImpact on Risk Assessment
Cladding PanelsEvaluation of combustibility (e.g., MCM with PE core vs. solid aluminium).
InsulationAssessment of thermal performance versus fire propagation characteristics.
Cavity BarriersVerification of horizontal and vertical fire stopping integrity.
SubstructureAssessment of the frame material (timber, steel, or concrete).

The interaction between these components determines the systemic performance of the wall. Insurers typically require detailed technical data, often derived from British Standard (BS) 8414 tests or European Classifications (EN 13501-1), to determine how the fabric might contribute to external fire spread. A lack of granular data regarding these materials often results in a "precautionary" premium increase, where the insurer prices for the highest perceived risk in the absence of evidence to the contrary.

Regulatory Context in England and Wales

The regulatory landscape, shaped significantly by the Building Safety Act 2022 and the Fire Safety Act 2021, indirectly influences insurance premiums by standardising how risk is reported. The introduction of the "Accountable Person" and "Principal Accountable Person" roles has formalised the responsibility for managing fire and structural safety in higher-risk buildings.

In England and Wales, the Golden Thread of information is intended to provide a digital record of a building’s design and construction. For insurers, this transparency is critical. If a building owner can demonstrate robust regulatory compliance and a comprehensive Safety Case Report, the insurer has a more reliable basis for calculating the premium. Conversely, failure to meet statutory deadlines for registration or assessment can lead to difficulties in securing affordable coverage or, in some cases, a withdrawal of capacity from the market.

Insurance Premiums

Considerations for Building Owners and Managers

Managing agents and RMC directors must understand that insurance premiums are inextricably linked to the building’s technical documentation. The procurement of insurance for buildings with identified cladding issues often requires a specialist broker who understands the nuances of the EWS1 (External Wall System Fire Review) process.

It is common practice for insurers to request specific documentation before inviting renewal terms, including:

  • The most recent Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) and, where applicable, the Fire Risk Appraisal of External Walls (FRAEW).
  • Details of any interim fire safety measures in place, such as a waking watch or enhanced alarm systems.
  • A clear timeline and funding plan for any proposed remediation works.
  • Confirmation of the professional qualifications of the surveyors who conducted the assessments.

Failure to provide accurate information regarding the building fabric can lead to the voiding of a policy or the rejection of a claim under the Insurance Act 2015, which mandates a 'duty of fair presentation'.

Common Misunderstandings

A frequent misconception is that the completion of an EWS1 form with a 'satisfactory' rating (such as A1 or B1) will automatically and immediately result in a reduction of insurance premiums to pre-2017 levels. While a positive rating is a significant factor, premiums are also influenced by wider market conditions, such as the global reinsurance market and the general inflation of rebuild costs.

Another misunderstanding involves the relationship between "compliance" and "insurability." A building may technically meet the Building Regulations in place at the time of its construction, yet an insurer may still deem the risk too high for their specific appetite or may charge a premium that reflects a modern understanding of material performance. The insurance market often applies a more stringent set of criteria than the minimum statutory requirements, focusing on property preservation rather than just the life safety objectives of the Building Regulations.

Understanding insurance premiums requires familiarity with several interrelated industry terms:

  • Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): A government tax applied to general insurance premiums, which must be accounted for in service charge budgeting.
  • Professional Indemnity (PI) Insurance: The coverage held by the consultants and contractors performing the cladding testing or repair; its availability and cost also impact the overall project feasibility.
  • Rebuild Cost Assessment (RCA): A formal valuation of the cost to reconstruct the building from scratch, used to set the 'Sum Insured' upon which the premium is calculated.
  • Excess/Deductible: The initial amount of a claim that the policyholder must bear; higher excesses are sometimes used to mitigate rising premium costs.
  • Market Capacity: The total amount of risk that insurers are willing to accept across the sector, which fluctuates based on historical losses and economic trends.

Insurance Premiums

Rope Access Cladding Inspection on High-Rise FacadeRope access technician in harness inspects a brick-clad high-rise facade beside glass balconies.rope access cladding inspection technician inspecting brick clad 3

Insurance Premiums