Cladding Testing

Glossary · Two-word term

Composite Material

In short

material made from two or more constituent materials with different properties

Composite materials in the UK cladding industry are engineered products combining two or more constituents, such as metal-faced panels with insulating cores. Their performance is assessed based on their chemical composition and reaction to fire within a building's external wall system.

Last updated

Appears 151 times across this site

Composite Material

Definition and Composition

In the context of the UK built environment, a composite material is defined as a material engineered from two or more constituent materials with significantly different physical or chemical properties. When combined, these constituents produce a material with characteristics distinct from the individual components. The objective of such engineering is typically to achieve a specific performance balance, such as high strength-to-weight ratios, enhanced durability, or specific thermal insulation properties.

Within external wall systems, the term most frequently refers to panels where a core material is sandwiched between two outer skins. The skins provide structural rigidity and aesthetic finish, while the core provides volume, insulation, or additional fire resistance. While the most discussed iteration in recent years involves metal-faced panels, composite materials also encompass glass-reinforced plastics (GRP), fibre-cement products, and various high-pressure laminates (HPL).

Application in External Wall Systems

Composite materials are fundamental to modern building envelopes. Their primary utility lies in their ability to provide a weather-tight, thermally efficient, and aesthetically versatile facade without the significant weight associated with traditional masonry. In a typical rainscreen cladding arrangement, composite panels are fixed to a supporting subframe, which is in turn attached to the building’s structural slab or inner leaf.

The performance of these systems is not solely dependent on the composite panel itself but on the interaction between the panel, the insulation behind it, the cavity barriers, and the fixing method. Because composite materials often involve the bonding of dissimilar substances—such as aluminium and polyethylene, or wood fibres and thermosetting resins—their behaviour under thermal stress and their reaction to fire are complex. Consequently, the specification of these materials requires precise engineering to ensure they meet the specific requirements of the building’s height, use, and location.

Regulatory Context in England and Wales

The regulatory framework governing the use of composite materials in England and Wales is primarily defined by the Building Regulations 2010, specifically Approved Document B (Fire Safety). Following significant legislative updates, the criteria for materials used in the external walls of "relevant buildings" (typically those over 18 metres, or 11 metres in certain circumstances) have become increasingly stringent.

For high-rise residential buildings, the focus is often on the combustibility of the composite core. The European classification system (BS EN 13501-1) is used to categorise the reaction to fire of these materials, ranging from A1 (non-combustible) to F (easily flammable). Under current UK regulations, many new high-rise developments are restricted to using materials that achieve a classification of A2-s1, d0 or A1. For existing buildings, the presence of composite materials with lower classifications often necessitates a detailed fire risk appraisal of external walls (FRAEW) in accordance with PAS 9980:2022.

Implications for Cladding Testing and Appraisal

When a building undergoes a facade survey or an EWS1 (External Wall System) assessment, identifying the exact nature of composite materials is a priority. Because many composite panels look identical from the exterior, invasive sampling is often required. This involves removing small sections of the cladding to inspect the core and the internal composition of the wall system.

Testing methodologies generally fall into two categories:

Test TypeObjective
Small-scale Lab TestingIdentifies the specific material composition and calorific value of the core.
Large-scale System TestingEvaluates how the composite panel performs as part of a complete wall assembly (e.g., BS 8414).
Adhesive/Bond TestingAssesses the integrity of the bond between the skins and the core over time.

These assessments determine whether the composite material, in its specific configuration and environment, meets the functional requirements of the Building Regulations. It is a common industry finding that the same composite panel may be deemed acceptable in one architectural context but require remediation in another, depending on the presence of cavity barriers and the type of insulation used.

Composite Material

Management and Professional Oversight

Building owners, managing agents, and directors of Resident Management Companies (RMC) must view composite materials as part of an integrated system rather than isolated components. The management of these materials involves maintaining accurate records of the specific product makes and models installed. In the absence of original "as-built" documentation, the burden of proof falls on the building owner to identify the materials through professional laboratory analysis.

Professional oversight is necessary because the degradation of composite materials can impact building safety and insurance. For instance, the delamination of skins from the core, or the ingress of moisture into a composite panel, can compromise both the structural stability of the facade and its thermal performance. Regular inspections should look for signs of warping, discolouration, or mechanical failure at fixing points, all of which may indicate that the composite material is not performing as intended.

Common Misunderstandings

A frequent misunderstanding is the assumption that all "composite" materials are inherently problematic. The term covers a vast spectrum of products, including those with mineral-filled cores that offer high levels of fire resistance. It is the specific chemical composition and the European fire classification of the panel that dictates its suitability for a specific height and building type, rather than the mere fact that it is a "composite."

Another common misconception is that replacing a composite panel with a non-combustible alternative is a simple "like-for-like" task. Because composite panels are often lighter than solid metal or stone alternatives, the existing subframe and the building’s primary structure may not be designed to carry the additional load of a different material. Any proposed change from a composite system to another material requires a full structural and thermal reassessment by a qualified engineer.

Understanding composite materials requires familiarity with several related industry terms:

  • ACM (Aluminium Composite Material): A specific type of composite panel consisting of two thin aluminium sheets bonded to a non-aluminium core.
  • MCM (Metal Composite Material): A broader category including panels with skins made of zinc, copper, or stainless steel.
  • HPL (High-Pressure Laminate): A composite panel manufactured by layering wood or paper fibres with resins under high pressure and temperature.
  • Substrate: The surface or structure to which the composite material is applied.
  • Reaction to Fire: A measurement of how a material contributes to the development and spread of fire, distinct from "fire resistance," which measures a material's ability to resist the passage of fire through it.

Composite Material

Rope Access Cladding Inspection on Brick High-RiseTwo rope access technicians inspect a red brick-clad high-rise facade window using suspended equipment.rope access cladding inspection technicians inspecting brick clad

Composite Material